Helfrich Deserves Better

Oregon’s night, just like it’s season, ended in ugly fashion on a cold, rainy night in Corvallis as the Ducks fell to its in-state rival 24-34. Once again this season, Oregon and its fans had to watch a conference foe celebrate after taking revenge for the years of beatings Oregon had dealt out.

How quickly things change.

The season has been frustrating to watch and if there is any silver lining, it is the fact that the Band-Aid has now been completely torn off and the healing can now begin. The question, especially over the next few days, will be what ointment to rub on the wound.

Following tonight’s game, a brave reporter addressed the elephant in the room.

“Mark, this is blunt, but do you think your job is safe?” the reporter asked.

Helfrich, as expected, provided a safe, yet reasonable, answer, explaining that no job is safe in college football and that coaches are evaluated on 12 games per year.

The questions continued about whether or not a meeting had been scheduled between him and Athletic director, Rob Mullens, and whether or not he had seen improvement in his team over the course of the season.

According to Helfrich, no meeting had yet been scheduled and yes, he has seen improvement. At this point, to me, the details are not important.

Although there were some flaws tonight, the team did show they had made improvements last weeks against Utah. At the end of the day though, there were too many problems (youth, new coaches, new quarterbacks and a whole lot of injuries) to overcome this season, but there is absolutely every reason to believe there will be a solid turnaround next season. If the program and it’s fans stayed the course.

Unfortunately, that’s not likely to happen and if Helfrich does get fired, perhaps Oregon didn’t deserve him anyway.

How’s that for being blunt?

Anyone who knows me, at least in the world of college football, knows I try hard to be optimistic and uplifting, especially in the wake of a loss. This time though, my rainbows and sunshine have run out; and no, it’s not because of the loss/losses.

This time, it’s about the fans. If you’re a “Fire Helfrich” bandwagoner, you may want to get off the bus. In fact, I’m happy to escort you off.

Look, if you are concerned about the direction of the program and want to see if a change can work, I get it. I really do. Against what may be popular belief, I’m not completely delusional. The problem in all of this is how ridiculously spoiled many fans have become. I’ve heard and defended it for years. I love the Oregon fan base. I am part of it, after all.

Quite honestly though, the fact that there is even a discussion about Mark Helfrich (and likely most of the staff) being fired after one bad season, two years after competing in a National Championship is ridiculous and yes, spoiled.

The Ducks have had a tremendous run over the past decade. Phil Knight and other boosters have certainly had a hand in that.  Talented players, including an incredible run of good quarterbacks, have had a hand in that. One could even argue that the dedicated fan base has hand in that, buying tickets and gear.

You know who else had a hand in all of that success? Mark Helfrich.

Less than two years ago, Helfrich led Oregon to the first College Football Playoff and then to the National Championship. A month prior, he sat teary-eyed as a quarterback he recruited years before, Marcus Mariota, brought home Oregon’s first Heisman trophy. Suddenly, after one bad season, Helfrich is being widely criticized, called terrible names and having most of his success credited to Chip Kelly because “he was playing with Kelly’s players,”

Really?

Coach Helfrich surely took notes from Chip Kelly, but he absolutely gets credit for leading that season’s players all the way. Whether or not, Chip Kelly helped recruit the players or not, they simply didn’t coach themselves after Kelly left. Arguing otherwise is disrespectful and absurd.

Have there been some bumps in the road since that Natty run? Of course. So much was put into that season in attempts to bring home a championship to the program, there were sure to be some sacrifices. And to those that would argue, “But look at Alabama,” give me a break. Oregon isn’t Alabama or another other historical dynasty. One day it may be, but a few great seasons does not propel a team to dynasty ranks. And by the way, most programs take a dip after losing a Heisman winning quarterback.

It takes time to rebuild from that. Again, this isn’t Alabama.

Back to Helfrich.

Here is a coach that is homegrown and loyal. He’s been a success that many programs across the country would love to have. Mark my words (no pun intended). According to the players and his staff, he’s done an incredible job keeping the team battling this season despite the adversity. I imagine that doesn’t just include losing games, but losing the support of a fan base that so quickly left them. This may have been a rough season, but it no way warrants the disgraceful response from many Oregon fans and media pundits. “Fire Helfrich” hashtags, comparing him to sin, blaming him for crashing football super-god Chip Kelly’s Ferrari, and leaving stadium seats empty in protest.

Get a grip.

I’ve said it many times before and I’ll say it again, even after tonight’s loss. Oregon’s 2016 season woes are not entirely on it’s head coach. They are a combination of many things, most of which were not his fault and many of which he can easily turn around. if given the chance. Is there some house cleaning to do? Sure,  just like in most programs (ie: Stanford) across the country. This coaching staff has a lot of work to do, especially on defense. Side note: I’m still not sure how you take last year’s horrible defense and make it worse, but like most, I’m willing to give Hoke more time.

And if I am being really honest, there are many players that need to step up. If anything, the biggest problem this season was quite possibly a lack of player leadership. Whether it was from injuries, youth or whatever, enough leaders simply didn’t step up. Does that fall on Helfrich? Maybe, but as they say, you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it drink.

Following tonight’s loss against the beavers, Oregon RS Jr. defensive back, Tyree Robinson, addressed the leadership issues.

“This is not at all on Helfrich,” Robinson said.

“We respect Helfrich and at the end of the day, we are going to play for him. But it’s more than that. It’s players, it’s not just the coaches. My freshman year, we had guys like Ifo, Dargan, Hroniss, it was multiple leaders. I think now it’s probably like two or three guys and we can’t have that because it shows.”

At the end of day a select few will be the ones to really address the elephant in the room. They likely already have.

As Helfrich explained, in the world of college football, coaches get evaluated on 12 games a year. In this day and age of instant gratification, it very well may be that Oregon will make a knee-jerk reaction to silence the growing protest. That may end up being best for Helfrich anyway.

If this is what one bad season gets you at Oregon, maybe they never deserved you in the first place.

 

 

 

12 Comments on Helfrich Deserves Better

  1. Sorry but the transfer qb situation was a bad problem. It exposed the wound. Without Vernon we would have been 3 and 8. So really thats two bad seasons. They aren’t disciplined and they are lacking the toughness needed to compete for a title.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Nate Jackson // November 28, 2016 at 5:45 pm // Reply

      Well-written, and strong points! My only question… How does one explain the recruitment drop-off? How did we not have a qb in line, ready to take over when mariota left? Helfrich said no one wanted to play behind Marcus. But, I can’t buy that; simply because teams like Alabama, usc, etc … Have five star qbs waiting in line for the coveted spot every year! 🙂 I say poor recruiting. Same applies for the linemen. We have a TON of freshman playing. How do we not have a plethora of upper classmen waiting to get in? I know some were injured, but come on… There was a lack of planning/management going on for the Ducks, which has lead to the dramatic decline of our powerhouse. Your blog was a great read!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Couldn’t disagree more. I usually agree with your post but this one …no. Helfrich definitely does not get credit for Marcus or for going to the Championship game. Helf was indeed running off of what Oregon had become in the Chip era, he had created nothing himself at that point. These years now… he would show what kind of coach he was. It’s sad because I really like him and wish he could stay but I think he just doesn’t have what we need.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Anita Stromme // November 27, 2016 at 10:58 am // Reply

    I totally agree with you. He was a fan growing up and this is his dream job. He wants to win as much as the fans do. Give him another year.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I have been a Duck fan since the late 80’s, when 2 buddies of mine went a played for the Ducks. I have one question. How many losing season’s did Rich Brooks have before he had a winning season? Mark Helfrich had 1 possibly 2 bad seasons, now everyone wants the coaches head; I’d give him another season or two to right the ship.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. His name is Rob Mullens, not Rich.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. It’s not just one bad season. The Ducks were bailed out last year by Vernon. There was the embarrassing blowout loss at Autzen to Utah last year, the WSU loss at hom(he pulled out Freeman in the WSU game when the Ducks were up 10 and only needed a first down to ice it) and the embarrassing loss in the Alamo Bowl. Not to mention recruiting dipped last year. He hired a guy to be DC who has not been a DC in 30+ years and that was in high school. And the defense was one of the worst in college football in the last decade statistically. Mark seems like a nice guy, but he seems over his head when it comes to being a head coach.

    Like

  7. You gave me A LOT to think about…. I have been on the “bandwagon” and I am not completely off, but you have given me more to consider. The leadership void is basically unseen to the public but HUGE…in any program. Coaches can only do so much…but I also think the tenured coaches who provide stability are also an issue. I just don’t see “hunger” in the program… DRIVE… and that’s evident in the coaches who have been at Oregon riding that train for awhile. Look at the Huskies and how they resemble their HUNGRY coaching staff. I like our coaches…they are all great guys. I just think now might be the right time to clean house…

    Liked by 1 person

    • I absolutely agree with you. The lack of fire from players and many of the assistants has been evident in my opinion. I definitely felt Helfrich was trying which is why I’ve continued to have his back in this. As Vernon Adams said yesterday…there is just so much more to it and firing Helfrich would be a mistake. Just my opinion.

      Like

  8. Why Brady Hoke gets to keep his job is beyond me. He is the one that should go. He couldn’t win in Michigan, and he is no help to Oregon.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: